Search
Liberty Links
Media Links
Previous posts
Archives
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- October 2008
Can I just clarify something... The outrage at Simon Hughes is because he used prostitutes, right? Not because he was gay but didn't tell anyone? I mean, he'd have been treated the same (apart from the above picture) if he'd used ladies of the night, instead of gentlemen of the night?
Simon Hughes in pays for sex shock would be more appropriate. Though they probably wouldn't win any votes off the Tories if they had a gay leader. Or a leader from a minority, or a woman. Actually, I take it back, the Tories did ok with the woman leader.
Posted by Matt | Fri Jan 27, 10:44:00 am
No, the problem is that he's a liberal and yet still blatantly lied about it as recently as this week:
Jan 14 The Daily Telegraph: "The answer is no, as it happens, but if it was the case - which it isn't - I hope that it wouldn't be an issue.
Jan 16 The Independent: "No, I'm not. But it absolutely should not matter if I was. If I was, and if people were to judge me on that, I would ask them to think again. There is no reason why you shouldn't have a gay leader of a party, or even a gay PM.
Jan 24 The Guardian: "I'm a single guy, which is why I guess it's easy for people to speculate. I'm not going to go into details of relationships but I made a statement, made it clearly and it hasn't changed since last week."
Jan 24 BBC2's Newsnight: Asked about the conduct of the 1983 Bermondsey by-election in which the homosexuality of Peter Tatchell, the Labour candidate, was clearly targetted, Mr Hughes said: "I have never been comfortable about the whole of that campaign as Peter knows, and I said that to him in the past privately and publicly".
Jan 26 The Sun: "I am perfectly willing to say that I have had both homosexual and heterosexual relationships in the past. I hope that does not disqualify me from doing a good job in public life and I propose to carry on doing that with the usual enthusiasm and determination.
The 'shock' bit is intended to be sarcastic, since everyone has known he enjoys the company of men for ages.
He was very brave to go on Question Time last night, and put up a good show.
He denied out right that he had ever paid for sex, which might turn out to be a mistake as it's rumoured that barmen from most of the gay pubs and clubs are lining up to sell their stories to the tabloids.
I think it will cement his support amongst LibDem members - they love a minorities, outsiders and victims. If Hughes plays his cards right he'll be all three soon.
Posted by Ben | Fri Jan 27, 12:02:00 pm