Monday, October 27, 2008

Election

It seems odd to me that Florida ends up as the state with the largest population, and thus the greatest number of electoral collage votes, that isn't strongly aligned so often in US elections. The residents of Florida, generally speaking, are unlikely to live out the term of the new president. Many children might believe Disneyland is where good people go when they die. It's not far off, as many good Americans go to Florida when they're warming up to dying.

At the moment the polls suggest that Florida will not be required. In what is a popular move over the past 50 years, the vote has swung hard the other way after two terms from the Monkey King. Obama looks to have more than 300 electoral college votes in the bag, and plenty in the balance, as the most recent polls see it. He needs 270. But we can't count the votes before they are cast. I'll be overseas and away from the media when the vote happens, but I have my fingers crossed in one particular direction, and it's a predictable one for those who know me.

Florida, though, I expect to go to the Republicans. Their candidate has a lot in common with the residents of the Sunshine State. Presumably the huge publicity around Sarah Palin comes from the fact that McCain would be unlikely to survive the first year of his presidency, so Palin would be more important than the usual vice-president.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Taking sides, sharing and playing nicely

I'm afraid this is all going to be highly metaphorical and abstract - I haven't been watching the news recently, and my sources for this range from anecdotes on international politics outside Europe to a popular children's movie.

This afternoon I was watching Muppet Treasure Island. Without ruining the plot for anyone who hasn't seen it but still wants to, there is a "Good side" and a "Bad side" in the film, and Kermit is on the good side. There's a point when they get to the island where the band is playing and one musician asks the other "Hey, are we on the pirate's side or the captain's side?". The other replies "Don't get involved in the politics, just play the gig".
In Singapore I heard a bit about South East Asian politics, and the well-educated and informed people I was dining with at the time made the various political factions in the region sound like bickering children. And it didn't take long for me to realise that this doesn't apply to just South East Asia, it applies to the whole world. The people who make the best politicians, and the people who rise to the top in the various parties around the world are the people who are best at bickering. Blair, Bush, John Howard over here in Oz, the opposition leaders (or whatever you call them) in the US and UK, Ms Clinton and Cameron - they were probably all little fuckers when they were children, the sort of child that makes you wish they hadn't banned smacking kids or the cane. You know, the sort that lie about something with a big grin on their face, like they're getting away with something. And they don't get any more mature about it when they grow up, they just get better at hiding it (in most cases).

When kids bicker and there's no obvious solution, the parents normally send them to bed. The problem is, there are no parents to do this, and no bed to send them to. Either that, or there's only one parent, and it's the same age as everyone else, it's just built like a brick-shithouse. Or further, the one parent we have is really a collective of children, and a handful of the kids seem to ignore the parent half the time anyway. Anyone who has read Lord of the Flies knows what happens when there are no parents.


So, to continue a metaphor too far, how do we stop Piggy from being killed? How do we stop Ralph and Jack going off to different sides of the island and putting on warpaint? When do the grown-ups arrive? And when two countries are in dispute, should we send in one of the parents we have, or just play the gig? What I'm trying to say, in as flowery and roundabout a way as possible, is how do we solve problems between two countries when the leaders of those countries are invariably both smug little bastards who won't ever back down, and who deserve a good slap?

I have no idea what this cartoon means, by the way, it just had a reference to Southeast Asia in it.


Monday, March 26, 2007

More Multimedia Brown

Friday, March 23, 2007

Back to the Future

There are many of all political dissuasions that long for the days of the crude simplicity of the Cold War.

Chief amongst them would seem to be Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who today was granted a US visa to allow him to address the UN Security Council to defend his Iran's controversial nuclear programme. Feels like the Cuban Missile Crisis, right?

Also today, the Iranians have kidnapped fifteen British Sailors who were patrolling the smuggling runs in the Gulf. Smells like a Cold War bargaining chip, right?

So who gains from another Cold War? On the face of it: everyone. We get a clear nation state as an enemy instead of all this asymmetrical warfare stuff. And that’s just easier for Governments, newspapers, soldiers, protesters, arms dealers, Bono, churches, film makers et al.

We get an automatic balance of power in the Middle East with Iraq becoming the new Berlin. Let’s not forget that many pro Cold War theorists point to 50 years of peace in Europe as a bit of a result.

Someone will hand nukes over to the Iranians; probably the Ruskies, or the French (actually the French would sell them, but that’s by the by), so all the people worrying about the US being the world’s only Super Power would have a new hero to replace the USSR.

The only people who might lose out on the stability of a good old Cold War would be the Chinese. But then they could have had one if they wanted, but they chose instead to be rich and friendly (to other countrys – they’re still Bastards to their own people, but that should pass).

Updated Gordon Brown multimedia special


Video via dizzy

Gordon The Mystery Cat by 18 Doughty Street.




Comrade Brown picture by Beau Bo D'Or




Monday, March 12, 2007

Three Reasons Why We Need Trident

There are three very valid reasons why we need the Trident Submarine-launched ballistic missile system (SLBM)

1. The past
2. The present
3. The future

In the past we were lucky. Nowadays we’re dealing with people that want to blow us and our way of life into small irradiated pieces. Who knows what the hell we’re going to face in the future?

Read my hair brained, one eyed, dangerously neo conservative logic here you tree hugging, lefty defeatists.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Can it be a coincidence?


Recently, David Cameron admitted that he had smoked marijuana at Eton. A recent poll suggests that, should Brown take the reins of the Labour Party (officially I mean), Cameron is much more likely to be elected.


I put it to you that David Cameron has never touched a joint in his life. The Conservative Party have hired a spin doctor. Smoking at Eton - it's perfect. The upper middle classes will think "That's right, he was at Eton. Must be a good egg". The liberal middle classes will think "Wow, he smoked pot? Can't be such a (insert anti-Conservative slur here) after all". The working classes will think either "Well, it was at school. He seems ok now" and keep voting Labour anyway, or "The Sun says vote Conservative. I'm voting Conservative".


All Labour need to do is find a way of revealing the truth that doesn't look like they're aware of the above, and they'll win some ground back. Surely?

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Exploitation! Conspiracy!

Following on from the story featured in the British papers over the summer that a poor naive, unsuspecting rock musician was horribly exploited by a disabled woman, Policy Blender is pleased to bring you an exclusive story of conspiracy, exploitation and misguidance!

Apparently, a group of evil so-called scientists are plotting to take advantage of vulnerable, unassuming Western governments and energy companies, by fabricating evidence that human activity is increasing global temperatures! This is ludicrous of course - I mean, it snowed only last week, and I went skiing with my wife a month or so ago. Anyway, firstly everyone knows that proper science is about experimentation against a control, and how can they know the oceans weren't going to rise anyway? Or that the weather was going to get silly, or that the deserts were going to expand at ever-increasing rates? Secondly, the people who really benefit from the credence that global warming might get if their plan comes to fruition aren't the people in lower-and-lower-lying coastal areas, or the people with breathing difficulties in major cities, but the people doing doctorates on climatology, and the organisations that promote reduced energy consumption. Currently a grant for a PhD student runs to as much as £18,000 p.a. - and scientists pretend to be unbiased!


The whole thing stinks to high heaven, and it's time it was stopped.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Snow Terror Hits UK: Government Suspends Civil Liberties

Motorists face heavy fines and possible imprisonment if they are caught on the roads today.

In response to the recent snow attack the Home Secretary has introduced special crisis measures, effectively putting the county in a wartime curfew. Dr Reid said in a statement this morning:

“I have to put the public’s safety first. Driving in snow is dangerous because it is slippy and people might get hurt. It is a government’s responsibility to look after its citizens”

The Liberal Democrats issued a statement in conjunction with Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth:

“This recent snow attack is our own fault, it’s got something to do with carbon and we must immediately stop being capitalists because otherwise we’ll all die”

The Conservatives were unavailable for comment as they were said to be ‘making a snowman like the nice, normal, electable people they are’.

Monday, February 05, 2007

Rudy can’t fail?

Some might say that Rudolf Giuliani is the Republican dream ticket. He’s certainly their best chance of holding on to the White House in the aftermath of the Bush years.

Giuliani has given his strongest hint yet that he will run for the Oval office in 2008 by filing a statement of candidacy with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Monday. Though no announcement has been made and there’s no mention of the statement on his website. It seems the former New York Mayor is keen for this move to be interpreted as keeping his options open as he continues his diverse tour of US states.

Rudy’s CV is multifaceted and represents a refreshing change from the evangelical campaigns of the past. In summary:

- He’s never condemned abortion
- He’s tough on terror
- He’s tough on crime
- He’s pro Gay rights
- He’s not a Democrat

The traits that make Giuliani unpopular with GOP Grandees may well prove to be the hook that wins back some liberal states come election time. However for this reason a Giuliani candidacy would represent a gamble – will his appeal to liberal floaters destabilise his base? Rudy would be wise to employ Karl Rove’s ‘dog whistle’ strategy in red states to limit any potential backlash.

With Senator McCain having made the early running, it’s not even certain that Giuliani will enter the race for nomination. What is certain, however, is that if he gets the candidacy the normal rules will be thrown out of the window. The 2006 campaign will be much more colourful than a choice between Barack and white.

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Police Interview Blair Again

Tony Blair was questioned by police in relation to their on-going inquiry last Friday.

This information was suppressed until today.

Chris has just mentioned that the only thing that separates us from a Banana Republic is tradition. Thank God for tradition, at least.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Levy arrested again

Tony Blair’s chief fundraiser, Lord Levy, has been arrested by police for a second time. This follows last week’s high profile arrests of Ruth Turner and John McTernan, Blair’s Director of Government Relations and Director of Political Operations respectively.

The whiff of top-level corruption reeks stronger by the day. Could this be why there are rumours that Blair is preparing a speedy departure…?

All political careers end in failure. Blair’s legacy shopping has seemed somewhat frantic latterly – like the workaholic husband who’s realised that it’s 22:00 on February 13 and breakfast in bed and flowers to her office won’t cut it for the fifth year in a row.

18:45 Update:
Lord Levy has been arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The “conspiracy” caveat in this instance is interesting – who was he conspiring with, and will he protect them? Will they protect him?

Prime Minister’s Questions will be interesting tomorrow. That is unless something really bad happens and Blair plays the ‘tragic magic’ card to get off the hook. Is that too cynical? Tanks at Heathrow?

Guido has campaigned long and hard on the Loans for Lordships issue. The power of political bloggers is becoming more evident.

image hat-tip Theo Spark
(site NSFW)

Friday, January 26, 2007

Blair urged to push through gay adoption laws


At some point this year, homosexuals (pictured) will be able to adopt. This has caused outrage from the Catholic Church, and Christianity as a whole. It's probably caused outrage from Islam and Judaism too, but as the media (or the media I read at least) is generally pro-gay-rights and pro-hating-America, the Muslim angle has almost certainly been overlooked as it would portray. I'm not sure why Judaism hasn't come into it.

Oh, I just checked and both of these religion are right behind the Catholics and the Protestants - they think that people's religious beliefs are much more important than equality for people who choose to have sex in a different way.

I hope that one day governments begin to recognise that race, disability, gender and age are not choices, and so we shouldn't discriminate against people based on these things. Sexuality of any kind is about what you do and not what you feel, so it is largely a choice - but heterosexual and homosexual feelings are arguably not a choice, so we shouldn't discriminate against people based on who they are attracted to (with some notable exceptions I won't go into). Religious beliefs are a choice, though they're one that many people take so seriously they're prepared to kill and die to prove they made the right one. (I'm trying to spark a debate here, so please do argue with me). Where religion goes against any of the above, it should always take second place.

This site says the Bible doesn't say anything bad about homosexuality anyway. Perhaps it just creeps out the Pope?

Thursday, January 25, 2007

New Broadsheet Format

The Policy Blender is proud to be published in our new ‘broadsheet’ format. Research has shown that, although our tabloid format was useful for commuters and more accessible in style, the pages were quite small. Our research also showed that not many people enjoy our quality output on the train anyway.

We would like to take this opportunity to assure our readers that, although we are no longer a ‘tabloid’ format, we will strive to maintain the historically low standards of which we are proud.

The same weak quality of satire, politically incorrect jokes and poor taste will be upheld, with every effort made to desecrate not only the English language but our cultural and historical values too.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Breaking News: Castro not dead yet

Ailing Cuban dictator Fidel Castro is tonight still alive (as at 17:34 GMT).

Hundreds of thousands of half-arsed student-rebel types around the world are yet again denied their chance to grieve by the Leftist idol’s impressive staying power.


Fidel, shown on the left of international T-Shirt entrepreneur Che Guevara, underwent intestinal surgery for Diverticulitis on July 31 and has been treated for resulting complications since.


What’s the betting that when he finally shuffles the mortal coil the BBC’s obituary is slightly more positive than that for Pinochet? Despite the Callous Cuban’s much more extensive political execution record (3:1 – making Augusto look very ordinary).