LibDems follow Tory lead
The third labour term has obviously upset the other two parties. First Howard resigned and was replaced by Tony Cameron. Then Charles Kennedy fabricates an entirely spurious reason for his resignation, so that the LibDems can have a leader who is a bit more Blair than the last one.
I mean, the man was famed for 'liking a drink' and all of a sudden it's a 'bad PR move' for him to say so? Thousands, hundreds of thousands, of people suddenly start saying, 'He shouldn't have said that, that was a bad move' despite the fact we all knew! 'The public won't stand for it, the voters won't stand for it' we all say, as if we're not the public and we don't have a vote. The only problem with Kennedy was that he was so dull. By giving himself a sensible excuse to resign, they can elect a more interesting leader, and who knows, maybe even gain ground on the Blameron twins.
Or perhaps not.
I mean, the man was famed for 'liking a drink' and all of a sudden it's a 'bad PR move' for him to say so? Thousands, hundreds of thousands, of people suddenly start saying, 'He shouldn't have said that, that was a bad move' despite the fact we all knew! 'The public won't stand for it, the voters won't stand for it' we all say, as if we're not the public and we don't have a vote. The only problem with Kennedy was that he was so dull. By giving himself a sensible excuse to resign, they can elect a more interesting leader, and who knows, maybe even gain ground on the Blameron twins.
Or perhaps not.
