« Home | Surely Nixon was worse? » | Difficulties with depression epidemic getting gove... » | Blair determines to defeat ideologies of terrorist... » | Democrats seek political gain from Katrina » | 'Spy' cons 8 people out of £1m » | American South desperately needs food, water, phot... » | Rampant Leftism » | Paisley Appointed to Mediation Helpline » | Mandelson's Bra Issues » | Regression Therapy »

North Korea agrees to give up nuclear arsenal on condition of Western reciprocation

North Korea have agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal on condition that countries with an aggressive, unstable background elsewhere agree to give their weapons up.

Pakistan and India have had ongoing disputes in which fingers have crept precariously close to buttons. France has a history of aggressive behaviour, including the Napoleonic Wars, and repeated nuclear testing in various French territories, in order to demonstrate to restless populations the wrath they will incur if they step out of line. The United Kingdom has shown itself to be more than willing to perform aggressive acts at the whim of its allies, both in Europe and North America. The United States is the only country to have ever used nuclear weapons in armed conflict, on real people. Israel's history of aggressive behaviour against its neighbours, and China's invasion of Tibet and border disputes with India are more than enough to point to an unstable political history. Of these, all but Israel, India and Pakistan have signed a treaty pledging to dismantle the weapons they have.


Bang!

The rogue states who continue to hold nuclear weapons, despite having signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and pledging to dismantle them more than thirty years ago, are now the only thing stalling a safer world. We'll bring you more as the story unfolds.


We also spelt nucular wrong.


On a serious note - have you seen Americans using the English english spelling of Theatre? I know there's 'Masterpiece Theatre' (or there was) but apparently people are using Movie Theatre rather than Theater to describe what we'd call a cinema.

I also think the Batman comment could inspire us to a new way of labelling pictures. We could have a picture of John Prescott punching the guy who egged him, with kerpow! written underneath.


No - Kerpow is an American word. It's your cultural contribution to the enrichment of our shared language. Probably as significant as our contribution of the word 'chav', which if it hasn't been made popular overseas, is worth finding out about. See this site for a detailed outline.


John Kerry should have said that in November.


He probably said it in December...

"I've never wanted to concede, even when I conceded"

Post a Comment