« Home | Breaking news! Ken wins Eiffel Tower in poker game! » | Blair talks about private life again » | New Survey puts British men top of "this big" » | Time for Flat Tax to be on the Agenda » | IDS - "Careful not to Choose Someone Electable" » | 'New' Lions to Tour NZ » | Extra! Extra! Idiots hurt self by being idiots! » | BBC strikes, Pope says Mass, bear defeacated in tr... » | Saddam on G.I. Diet » | Blair Treated for Back Pain »

Database for ID Card Ministers

Each Minister proposing that the state should database its citizens "for their own security" will appear in a new database under a new policy thought up on the cuff at about half five this afternoon by a member of the not very influential centre-left-centre-right think-tank 'PolicyBlender'.

The Politicians would also be required to pay the administrative fees for the new three-foot long cards, which PolicyBlender estimates could be in the region of several thousand pounds each. Each pro-ID card Minister would be forced to carry the card at all times, even whilst sleeping with someone else's wife.


Blunkett: card carrying loony


Blunkett's card is sporting a particularly bad likeness of him. Looks like he'll have to stump up for another one.... or get some serious surgery.


Ben, in case this site ever gets readers, can you get into the habit of using the word 'allegedly' when mentioning things like sleeping with other people's wives. Even agressively is fine, as in:

'George Bush is personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people for his own personal gain, for the continuing increase in carbon emissions worldwide and for the dire state of the American economy and he should be shot in the knees and left to bleed to death in the gutter, allegedly'.

We don't want to get sued, after all.


Maybe a single disclaimer somewhere would work in the vain of "all content on this site represents the opinions etc of those authoring it and as such we do not wish the content to be taken seriously... please don't sue us!"

Or sometyhing :-)


I agree with gonce - 'allegedly'

nope, I don't think I'm getting it...

Post a Comment